Content on this archived webpage is NOT UPDATED, and external links may not function. External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein.

Click here to go to the CURRENT USTR.GOV WEBSITE


World Trade Organization Adopts Report Ruling in Favor of the United States in Chicken Products Trade Dispute with China

September 25, 2013

Washington, D.C. – United States Trade Representative Michael Froman announced that today the World Trade Organization (WTO) adopted an August 2, 2013 dispute settlement panel report in favor of the United States in a major trade dispute with China, proving that China’s imposition of duties on U.S. chicken “broiler” products violates international trade rules. With the report now formally adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body, China must bring itself into compliance with its WTO obligations. In 2009 – the year before China imposed the duties – the United States exported over 613,000 metric tons of broiler meat to China. Exports fell almost 90 percent after the imposition of the duties.

“This decision represents a significant victory for American farmers and chicken producers and proves that the United States will not stand by while our trade partners unfairly hurt U.S. exports and U.S. jobs,” said Ambassador Froman. “Given the wide-ranging violations found by the WTO, I hope that China’s acceptance of the WTO’s decision without appeal signals a recognition by China that it needs to take a serious look at its trade remedies regime and bring its rules, procedures and practices into line with its WTO obligations.”

“Our poultry producers and all of our businesses and workers expect and deserve a fair, rules-based trade system. This report is a win for them,” said Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker. “At the Commerce Department, we work hard to ensure that the U.S. abides by our WTO obligations and that our investigations are transparent and procedurally fair to all parties. We will continue to work across the U.S. government to ensure that China recognizes that pursuing antidumping or countervailing-duty measures that are unjustified or based on political considerations is a losing strategy. More broadly, my Department will continue to support America’s entrepreneurs and businesses as they compete in the global economy and create good jobs here at home.”

“USDA’s long-standing partnership with the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has been instrumental in addressing barriers to U.S. agricultural exports, and today’s good news marks another accomplishment on behalf of U.S. producers,” said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. “China’s prohibitive duties caused a steep decline in exports of high quality U.S. broiler products to China, and with today’s news from the WTO, we look forward to seeing China’s market for broiler products restored for U.S. farmers and chicken producers.”



On September 27, 2009, China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) initiated antidumping and countervailing investigations of imports of so-called “broiler products” from the United States. Broiler products include most chicken products, with the exception of live chickens and a few other chicken products such as cooked and canned chicken. MOFCOM imposed antidumping and countervailing duties on these products on September 26, 2010 and August 30, 2010, respectively. The antidumping duties ranged from 50.3 percent to 53.4 percent for the U.S. producers who responded to MOFCOM’s investigation notice, while MOFCOM set an “all others” rate of 105.4 percent. In the CVD investigation, MOFCOM imposed countervailing duties ranging between 4.0 percent and 12.5 percent for the participating U.S. producers and an “all others” rate of 30.3 percent.

On September 20, 2011, the United States requested dispute settlement consultations with China concerning the conduct and results of MOFCOM’s antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. After consultations proved unsuccessful, the United States requested that the WTO establish a panel to hear U.S. claims that China violated numerous procedural and substantive obligations under the WTO’s Antidumping Agreement and Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.

In its report, the Panel found in favor of the United States on nearly all U.S. claims.

Specifically, with regard to MOFCOM’s substantive errors, the Panel found that China breached its WTO obligations by:

• Levying countervailing duties on U.S. producers in excess of the amount of subsidization;

• Relying on flawed price comparisons for its determination that China’s domestic industry had suffered injury;

• Unjustifiably declining to use the books and records of two major U.S. producers in calculating their costs of production; failing to consider any of the alternative allocation methodologies presented by U.S. producers and instead using a weight-based methodology resulting in high dumping margins; improperly allocating distinct processing costs to other products inflating dumping margins; and allocating one producer’s costs in producing non-exported products to exported products creating an inflated dumping margin; and

• Improperly calculating the “all others” dumping margin and subsidy rates.

With respect to procedural failings in the MOFCOM investigations, the Panel found that China breached its WTO obligations by:

• Denying a hearing request during the investigation;

• Failing to require the Chinese industry to provide non-confidential summaries of information it provided to MOFCOM;

• Failing to disclose essential facts to U.S. companies including how their dumping margins were calculated.

To view a full copy of the WTO dispute settlement report, click here.