By Ambassador Allen F. Johnson
Chief Agriculture
Negotiator
Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative
Mississippi has a rich history that includes being the
birthplace of Elvis and the Cotton Capital of the world. Even though Elvis has left the state,
cotton and agriculture are still a vital part of
Mississippi’s culture, history, and economy.
Agriculture is
Mississippi’s number one industry,
employing approximately 30 percent of the state’s workforce either directly or
indirectly. As a leading producer
of cotton, rice, and broilers,
Mississippi agriculture sustains a $3.8 billion industry
in the state. It is because of this success that
Mississippi’s farmers and ranchers find themselves part
of a national debate that will set the future course for the
United
States’ agricultural community.
There are two possible visions for the
future: one looks inward and is stagnant; the other is outward and dynamic. The inward vision focuses only on
supplying our domestic market. To
limit our ambitions to the domestic market is to endanger the growth prospects
for this and future generations of U.S. farmers.
To sustain our productivity, we must
recognize that a growing global economy creates new opportunities to access new
customers and rapidly growing markets overseas. Ninety-six percent of the world’s
consumers live outside of the United
States.
As the world’s population and world food
consumption continues to expand so will the demand for the high-value products
where the United
States has a comparative advantage. Nationwide, exports of agricultural
products grew more than three times as fast as the total of all
U.S. exports in the last year. The U.S.
Department of Agriculture has forecast record agricultural exports of $62
billion for this fiscal year. The United
States ranks first in the world for exports of
poultry, corn, soybeans, and cotton and third for exports of
rice.
Exports are crucial to
Mississippi’s cotton, rice, soybeans, and poultry
producers. Exports accounted for
$778 million for Mississippi farmers and ranchers in fiscal year
2003.
Mississippi is third in
U.S. cotton and cottonseed exports and fourth in
U.S. rice exports.
Realizing the need to further expand markets
around the world, we have concluded free trade agreements with 12 countries in
the last 3-1/2 years: Jordan, Bahrain, Chile, Singapore, Morocco, Australia,
Guatemala, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua and the Dominican
Republic. The combined population
of these countries represents a market of nearly 120 million people, which is
roughly the size of the smallest 38 U.S. states.
We are working on agreements with 10 more
countries: Panama, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Thailand, and the five-nations of the Southern
African Customs Union (SACU). Last year, the
U.S. exported $17.5 billion to these countries,
which, taken together would ranks as our 9th largest export
market.
These new free trade agreements, when
enacted, will expand opportunities for Mississippi producers. The CAFTA countries (Costa Rica, El
Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua) for instance, have agreed to
immediate duty-free access for soybeans and cotton, and preferential tariff-rate
quotas (TRQs) for rice and poultry will result in new and growing access for
those commodities as out-of-quota tariffs are phased out. The
Morocco agreement provides for immediate duty-free
access for cotton and soybeans and new and growing access for
U.S. poultry, including immediate duty-free
access for some processed poultry products. We also achieved new opportunities with
the CAFTA countries for corn, the region where corn was first propagated, where
over a million tons of U.S. exports will be allowed immediately
duty-free immediately and all corn tariffs removed over 15
years.
We are also advancing
U.S. interests in the World Trade Organization
(WTO) by working to level the playing field for
Americas’ farmers, ranchers and growers, who often
face high barriers to our world class products. Only in the WTO can all trading partners
be brought to the table to secure a comprehensive deal that benefits
U.S. agricultural interests by reducing all types
of trade-distorting policies.
The WTO framework agreement reached in late
July in Geneva will benefit American agriculture: eliminating export subsidies – including
the over $7 billion a year the EU is allowed to spend on export subsidies on a
wide range of products, including grains and poultry; reducing and further
harmonizing trade distorting domestic support – in particular the over $80
billion a year the EU can spend on trade-distorting domestic support; and
substantially increasing market access will benefit all of American
agriculture. Only by addressing
these three pillars of agricultural trade together, farmers and ranchers in the
United
States and around the world can win. We were successful in convincing
the West African cotton producing countries of this approach and addressing
cotton as part of global agriculture negotiations with all trade distorting
policies on the table as part of a single undertaking rather than the focus
solely being on U.S. subsidies.
We strongly believe that the best way to
address any distortions in world agricultural markets is through the WTO
agriculture negotiations, not through litigation. This is the message we have delivered
concerning Brazil’s challenge of our agricultural support
measures, including support for cotton farmers. While we welcomed certain findings by
the recent panel ruling, such as the fact that our decoupled income support
payments have not caused “serious prejudice” under WTO rules, we strongly
disagree with some aspects of the panel report and will defend our farmers by
appealing on these issues. We
believe the facts do not show that U.S. farm programs have distorted trade and
caused low cotton prices.
A level playing field for
Mississippi farmers also means that they will continue
to have recourse to strong remedies to address injurious dumped and subsidized
imports. Under the mandate for WTO rules negotiations that the
United
States insisted upon and obtained at the Doha
Ministerial, the strength and effectiveness of our trade remedies will be
preserved.
Enforcing existing trade agreements is just
as important as negotiating new agreements. For example, we have been actively
engaged in working with the Chinese to ensure that their tariff rate quotas
provide market access for U.S. cotton.
China is a critical market for
U.S. cotton exports, as it purchases over 20
percent of U.S. cotton production, and cotton in 2003 was
our second largest agricultural export to
China.
I am also working to protect our WTO rights to compensation for
Mississippi and other
U.S. rice producers who have been damaged by
recent changes to the EU’s rice import regime.
Many of our day-to-day activities involve
foreign sanitary and phytosanitary barriers – animal and plant health
issues. Together with the U.S.
Department of Agriculture’s scientists and technical staffs, we are constantly
working with industry to ensure that measures imposed by foreign countries, have
a scientific basis and are not unnecessarily trade restrictive. As needed and appropriate, we
initiate dispute settlement cases.
In fact, the United
States recently won a dispute with the Canadians
over their illegal subsidy to its dairy industry and initiated a case against
the EU and its’ restrictions on biotech products.
To build on
Mississippi’s proud agricultural traditions and heritage
and to ensure new opportunities for the current and future generations of farm
families, we must continue to embrace the outward vision as the road to the
future. By developing export
markets and continuing our long-standing agricultural heritage, farmers and
ranchers can look outward beyond America’s shores to the rest of the world.